ADVERTISEMENT

The late Archbishop of Manila (Philippines) Jaime Cardinal Sin said to the conferees at the 1986 Prison Fellowship International Conference:

Justice without mercy is tyranny, and mercy without justice is weakness.  Justice without love is pure socialism, and love without justice is baloney.

What do you think?  Spot on or full of baloney?  Why?

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
23 comments
  1. Shane:
    I can track along with the first half of the quote, it follows a kind of justice tempered by mercy theme, which is a common one that I can subscribe to as a Christian.

    The second half loses me, it is a sort of justice tempered by deli.

    I must be missing something.

  2. Shane:
    I can track along with the first half of the quote, it follows a kind of justice tempered by mercy theme, which is a common one that I can subscribe to as a Christian.

    The second half loses me, it is a sort of justice tempered by deli.

    I must be missing something.

  3. I agree with Andy…should have quit after the first sentence. I agree with that part, but the second part is a rather inaccurate definition and view of socialism, and I’m not sure why love requires justice.

  4. I agree with Andy…should have quit after the first sentence. I agree with that part, but the second part is a rather inaccurate definition and view of socialism, and I’m not sure why love requires justice.

  5. Contrasting and balancing justice and mercy seems appropriate; contrasting and balancing justice and love is confusing.

    Justice without mercy is cruel; mercy without justice is … related to turning the other cheek?

  6. Contrasting and balancing justice and mercy seems appropriate; contrasting and balancing justice and love is confusing.

    Justice without mercy is cruel; mercy without justice is … related to turning the other cheek?

  7. I think what he’s getting at is that “love” he’s getting at is “tolerance”. Love without truth. Would like to see the whole context of his message. I’m sure it would shed more light on it. I thought it was an interesting quote.

    I could be wrong though. Maybe he just has a real disdain for baloney.

  8. I think what he’s getting at is that “love” he’s getting at is “tolerance”. Love without truth. Would like to see the whole context of his message. I’m sure it would shed more light on it. I thought it was an interesting quote.

    I could be wrong though. Maybe he just has a real disdain for baloney.

  9. Makes me think of three aspects of God’s character – love, goodness and justice.. if any aspect is missing then the picture of God is skewed.

  10. Makes me think of three aspects of God’s character – love, goodness and justice.. if any aspect is missing then the picture of God is skewed.

  11. At first glance I agree with the complete quote. I would be interested in hearing a more specific word than “baloney” to describe love without justice. Maybe “anarchy?”

  12. At first glance I agree with the complete quote. I would be interested in hearing a more specific word than “baloney” to describe love without justice. Maybe “anarchy?”

  13. May I recommend a book by Paul Tillich- Love, Power, and Justice- It discusses what this quote is about.

  14. May I recommend a book by Paul Tillich- Love, Power, and Justice- It discusses what this quote is about.

Comments are closed.

You May Also Like

*Shocker* Free Condoms in School Leads to More Pregnancy

Kasey Buckles and Daniel Hungerman of Notre Dame University concluded that schools who distributed condoms to their students saw more pregnancies not less.

Can Christians Do That?

Angela had the following videos on her blog and I thought they…

Government Too Important: Lady Jane Grey and Exceptional Christians

Being in the limelight was not something Jane was used to, nor…

James Madison’s Insight Into Today’s Abuse of Power

With Federalist 51 it seems that James Madison could see into the future with the current disregard of checks and balances, but he just knew human nature.