From Why We’re Not Emergent (By Two Guys Who Should Be) in the chapter entitled, “Modernism: The Boogeyman Cometh”, Kevin DeYoung states:

The biggest irony about the emergent church may be just this: For all their chastisement of all things modern, they are in most ways thoroughly modern.  Many of the leading books display a familiar combination of social gospel liberalism, a neoorthodox view of Scripture, and a post-Enlightenment disdain for hell, the wrath of God, propositional revelation, propitiation, and anything more than a vague moralistic, warmhearted, adoctrinal Christianity.

Much of what I have read of the Emergent Church is very reminiscent, in my mind, of turn-of-the-century (20th) liberalism – just repackaged.  Perhaps there truly is nothing new under the sun.  I’d love to hear your thoughts, especially from those who disagree – how is it different? 

Before you comment, I do recognize that not every person who embraces the emergent movement believes the same things.  The quote above is a summary of emergent movement “leadership” positions based on their writings.

You May Also Like

The Black Mass and the Decline of Civilization

Was the cancellation of the Black Mass at Harvard a triumph for…

Wedding Cakes, Wheaton College, and the Word of God

It’s in the news almost constantly now, and I’ve grown weary of…

To be offended, or not to be offended…

… that is the question. Good sense makes one slow to anger,and…

Ask God for Much and Great Things

Now to him who is able to do far more abundantly than…