From Why We’re Not Emergent (By Two Guys Who Should Be) in the chapter entitled, “Modernism: The Boogeyman Cometh”, Kevin DeYoung states:

The biggest irony about the emergent church may be just this: For all their chastisement of all things modern, they are in most ways thoroughly modern.  Many of the leading books display a familiar combination of social gospel liberalism, a neoorthodox view of Scripture, and a post-Enlightenment disdain for hell, the wrath of God, propositional revelation, propitiation, and anything more than a vague moralistic, warmhearted, adoctrinal Christianity.

Much of what I have read of the Emergent Church is very reminiscent, in my mind, of turn-of-the-century (20th) liberalism – just repackaged.  Perhaps there truly is nothing new under the sun.  I’d love to hear your thoughts, especially from those who disagree – how is it different? 

Before you comment, I do recognize that not every person who embraces the emergent movement believes the same things.  The quote above is a summary of emergent movement “leadership” positions based on their writings.

You May Also Like

Loving One Another Deeply

This week as we reflect on the death, burial, and Resurrection of…

The LORD Will Not Relent (Jeremiah 15:1-9)

15:1 Then the Lord said to me, “Though Moses and Samuel stood…

If My People Part 2: Humble Ourselves

Have you humbled yourself before God? Not a day goes by in our human lives that we do not have something to lay down before Christ.

Why Do Men Avoid Going to Church? Because We’re Sinners

Doug Giles make an argument that at first seems good if you…