Before I’m thrown under the bus for the title read the passage below.  It reminds me a lot of what Eric said back in May.

Dinesh D’Souza in his book Letters to a Young Conservative says the following:

Typically, the conservative attempts to conserve, to hold on to the values of the existing society. But what if the existing society is liberal? What if the existing society is inherently hostile to conservative beliefs? It is foolish for conservatives to attempt to conserve that culture. Rather, he must seek to undermine it, to thwart it, to destroy it at the root level. This means that the conservative must stop being conservative. More precisely, he must be philosophically conservative but temperamentally radical.

Why would we want to conserve a culture that is hostile to conservative beliefs?  We shouldn’t.

Thoughts?  What does being philosophically conservative but temperamentally radical look like?

HT: Blue Dot Blues

You May Also Like

Homosexuals You Are Not Entitled to Applause–No One Is

Miami Dolphins Safety Don Jones didn’t get the memo that he was to applaud Micheal Sam kissing his boyfriend after being drafted by the St. Louis Rams.

Farris: Are You An Evangelical Christian?

Michael Farris: A recent study reveals that many self-professed evangelicals don’t actually believe in fundamental principles of the Christian faith.

What Is Federalism?

The Utah Legislature’s Commission on Federalism in connection with Utah Valley University recently created a free course called “Principles of Federalism.”

Five Early American Political & Legal Theorists on Federalism

Read what early American political/legal theorists James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, Joseph Story, & John Marshall said about federalism.