Michael Ruse is an author and philosopher of biology at Florida State University.  He says something in a guest post at Science and the Sacred which struck me as odd coming from an self-described agnostic (atheists in respect to Christian doctrine), but serves as a rebuke to those who claim to be Christ-followers and yet deny essential truths.  In his mind you have more intellectual integrity as an atheist or agnostic than you would as a theologically liberal “Christian.”

I think of myself as an agnostic on deities and ultimate meanings and that sort of thing. With respect to the main claims of Christianity – loving god, fallen nature, Jesus and atonement and salvation – I am pretty atheistic, although some doctrines like original sin seem to me to be accurate psychologically. I often refer to myself as a very conservative non-believer, meaning that I take seriously my non-belief and I think others should do (and often don’t). If someone goes to the Episcopal Church for social or family reasons, or because they love the music or ceremonies, I have no trouble with that. Had I married a fellow Quaker, I might still be going to Quaker meetings. But I have little time for someone who denies the central dogmas of Christianity and still claims to be a Christian, except in a social sense. No God, no Jesus as His son, no resurrection, no eternal life – no Christianity.

HT: Erik Raymond

You May Also Like

The American Evangelical Mind and The Separation of Church & State

Continuing looking at how the American Evangelical mind has been shaped, Mark…

Talking About Jesus & Understanding the Gospel

How do I really know when I’m understanding the gospel?

Counterfeit Marriage: Unlawful or Lawless?

Iowa for Freedom (founded by former governor candidate, Bob Vander Plaats) wants…

Podcast: Relationships are Messy! (Matthew 7:1-6,12)

Shane’s sermon on Matthew 7:1-6, 12 given on 7/20/08 at Grace Evangelical Free…