As described by their outgoing General Counsel Bob Chanin at the NEA 2009 conference:

Despite what some among us would like to believe it is not because of our creative ideas. It is not because of the merit of our positions. It is not because we care about children and it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child. NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power.

And we have power because there are more than 3.2 million people who are willing to pay us hundreds of millions of dollars in dues each year, because they believe that we are the unions that can most effectively represent them, the unions that can protect their rights and advance their interests as education employees.

This is not to say that the concern of NEA and its affiliates with closing achievement gaps, reducing dropout rates, improving teacher quality and the like are unimportant or inappropriate. To the contrary. These are the goals that guide the work we do. But they need not and must not be achieved at the expense of due process, employee rights and collective bargaining. That simply is too high a price to pay.

And we wonder why public education is failing?

HT: Hawkeye Review

You May Also Like

Jeb Bush’s Flawed (Common) Core Values

Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush may be beating his chest in New Hampshire with a friendly group, but he’s been relatively silent on Common Core in Iowa.

The New Civics Pushes Progressive Advocacy Through Service Learning

David Randall: All around the country you can find a New Civics movement that teaches progressive politics to students using the language of civics.

College Leadership Group Disagrees with Obama’s Federal Teacher Prep Proposal

AACTE expressed disappointment in President Obama’s use of unilateral executive authority to implement federal priorities for teacher preparation.

A Tale of Two Minnesotans: Comparing Tim Pawlenty and Michele Bachmann on Education

Below is a side by side contrast between the two prospective 2012…