John Stossel, Libertarian that he is, has been asking some interesting questions lately with regard to the legalization of things like prostitution and drugs. As I recall, the subject of polygamy has also been raised and Stossel has no problem with that either.

Here’s a video of Stossel discussing some of these issues on Fox News:

Please don’t misunderstand. As much as I love Stossel, I am not in favor of what he suggests. The question I have is this: In our nation where evolution is taught as fact (and thus theism is usually dismissed as laughable) and where pluralism is essentially codified in the Establishment Clause, on what principled grounds can anyone object to things like prostitution or polygamy? Sure, practical arguments may be made against them, but that’s not why they have been prohibited in our nation. They have been prohibited on moral grounds for generations and these moral grounds came from our Christian consensus, which looked to the Word of God for its moral direction.

But the consensus is gone, pluralism is our established religion, and a consistent secularism would support Stossel’s claim that we simply ought to legalize these things. Only recapturing the Christian consensus will ensure that there will be Scriptural principles applied to law. Better yet, by the grace of God, let’s recapture the consensus and modify the First Amendment to acknowledge Him.

You May Also Like

Anti-Adoption Tax Bill Betrays American Families

Adam Graham: House Republicans can make needed tax reforms without penalizing families, failing to do so they should surrender any claim to be pro-family and pro-life.

#CPAC2014 Day Three Liveblog

Shane Vander Hart is at CPAC 2014 at the Gaylord National Convention Center outside of Washington, DC. Follow his liveblog throughout the day.

Bernie Sanders’ Unconstitutional Religious Litmus Test

U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders said he would not vote for Russell Vought because of his “unAmerican” view that Muslims can not be saved apart from Jesus.

Federal Judicial Marriage Rulings in Conflict

Now that there are conflicting federal court decisions on state laws defining marriage this could compel the Supreme Court to finally rule on the issue.