Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) impressed me with his rationale behind his decision to vote no on Solicitor General Elena Kagan’s nomination to the United State Supreme Court.  He brought up her work against the partial birth abortion ban, citing international law, her inability to defend DOMA, etc.  He cited her inability to discuss where our rights come from.  He brought up 12-13 reasons why he was voting no, and in my opinion made a great argument against her nomination.  I encourage you to watch the remarks in full below:

Contrast Senator Grassley’s action with the that of his colleague, Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC).  He said he would vote for Kagan’s nomination because he believes that elections matter.

Yes they do, somebody needs to primary Senator Graham and show him just how right he is.  Just because President Obama won the election doesn’t mean that you have to rubber stamp all of his nominations.

You May Also Like

Sarah Palin Has a PAC (3rd Update – Legit with video proof)

Kind of out of the blue SarahPAC was launched with no fanfare. …

Grassley Joins Bipartisan Bill to Protect Election Integrity

U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) joined as a co-sponsor for the Defending Elections from Threats by Establishing Redlines (DETER) Act introduced by U.S. Senators Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland) and Marco Rubio (R-Florida).

Chuck Grassley Discusses Government’s Diminishing Credibility

Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) spoke with Fox News’ Martha Maccallum on the declining credibility of government over President Obama’s broken promises.

Sarah Palin: Barack Obama’s Disregard for Israel’s Security Begs Clarity

By Sarah Palin As I noted on Judge Jeanine Pirro’s show this…