Council Bluffs, Iowa – November 10, 2010 – Secretary of State elect, Matt Schultz announced today that he has put together a transition team made up of excellent individuals in the fields of business and elections to help him hit the ground running in January.

Jim Gibbons will serve a Chairman of the Secretary of State transition team advising on issues and personnel decisions related to the business services division of the office.

Mary Mosiman, the Story County Auditor, will serve as Co-Chair of the Secretary of State transition team advising on issues and personnel decisions related to the elections division of the office.

Stephanie Laudner will serve as the Communications Director of the Secretary of State transition team.

"I am humbled by this opportunity to serve the people of Iowa as their next Secretary of State. I am honored to have Jim Gibbons, Mary Mosiman, and Stephanie Laudner as part of my transition team. This transition is very important so that we can hit the ground running in January and work to achieve those commitments we made to the people of Iowa by fighting to require everyone to show a Photo ID when they vote at the polls and work as a ‘Pro Jobs’ Secretary of State," said Schultz.

For more information, please visit http://www.VoteMattSchultz.com

You May Also Like

Recapping The First Week of The 2018 Session in the Iowa Legislature

Jason Schultz: As we get back in the habit of driving to the Capitol each day, I am reminded of how grateful I am to serve western Iowa as their Senator.  The work we do now will benefit Iowa for years and even a generation to come, and I am thankful they allow me to be a part of it.

Romney Touts Stronger Middle Class Plan in Des Moines

More jobs and higher take home pay was at the center of…

My Time With Steve King

Antonia Okafor: From my own experience, Steve King has proven to be a good man. I am thankful I have had the opportunity to get to know the truth about him.

Grassley Calls on Schumer to Apologize to Gorsuch, Kavanaugh

Chuck Grassley: “At best, it was an injection of partisan politics into a process that should be immune to them. At worst, it was a threat targeting two sitting members of the Supreme Court.”