I just visited several GOP Presidential candidate websites. All of these candidates are on my short list of possible “endorsements” (Like anybody cares who I endorse, some might consider it the kiss of death!).
Small things can make big differences. For example, Rick Santorum’s site has no way to contact him directly (that I could find), though there is a way to donate money. It also does not announce his schedule of appearances (in the media or in person). What if i wanted to interview him (I do!) or wanted to meet him (why not?)?
Neither Tim Pawlenty nor Michelle 
http://www.michelebachmann.com/
I’d love to hear what other non-committeds think of these or other candidate websites.
I did hear that Tim Pawlenty is going to be in Newton, Iowa next Tuesday at 4:00 PM at Uncle Nancy’s (No that is the actual name of the gender-bending Cafe on the square in Newton).
Thanks for subscribing!
2 comments
Visually I preferred Pawlenty’s, but not sure about using a nick-name on a campaign website – “Meet T-Paw”? What’s next M-Rom? Rick-San? Newt-G? Mmm-Bach? (sounds like the lyrics to a Hansen song), The Hermanator? I’m sure they all have ’em . . . just seems a little odd seeing it in that setting.
Out of the ones you listed, T-Paw’s is the best, no doubt. Santorum’s is a Cluster FFFFFF… Bachman’s is okay… nothing special, a little busy though.
As some other’s have said in the comments, Ron Paul’s is very good.
Comments are closed.