At-school_MomBy Michael Ramey

When we were in school, several parents were there on a regular basis helping out in the classroom or the library, chaperoning field trips, or leading special reading or art programs. They were just doing their part to improve our education.

But parents are not allowed in public schools today. Sure, there are those increasingly rare exceptions. But in general, a parent cannot even visit, let alone sit in on a class or become a regular part of the classroom community. And those terrific school districts sprinkled around the country who do still allow parents entrance grant it as a privilege, not as a parental right.

Washington Times columnist Jay Matthews recently lamented this fact in an article called “What’s Wrong with Parents Visiting a School?” Matthews had spoken with two sets of parents, each of whom had asked to sit in on a class with their child, whom they were looking to enroll in the school. In each case – one in Fairfax, VA and the other in Arlington – the answer was a solid, “No.”

That’s not to say schools should open their doors to just anyone. But Matthews’ article highlights the bigger picture – even parents familiar to the school and with children in attendance are being walled out by government regulations and bureaucratic policies.

We have come a long way from the 1986 Department of Education report which asserted – as the first principle in the Classroom section of the report – that“Parental involvement helps children learn more effectively.” And by depriving our schools of the parental presence, these policies have robbed the parents, the teachers, and especially the students of a terrific resource.

So, what if you are that parent and your child is in that school? How can you impact what and how your child learns? The answer is, you can’t.

According to the Supreme Court’s decision in Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925), citing Meyer v. Nebraska (1923), any government action that “unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents or guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control” is unconstitutional. That’s the good news.

The bad news is that the Ninth Circuit determined in Fields v. Palmdale (2005) “that the Meyer-Pierce right… does not entitle individual parents to enjoin school boards from providing information the boards determine to be appropriate….” And the current Supreme Court has chosen not to review that court’s decision, leaving it as binding law in the west and as a dangerous precedent for the rest of the country.
So once your child steps onto school grounds, you no longer have a say. You have been effectively “walled out,” and the schools can do and teach whatever they want. Here’s what the court in the Palmdale case decided:

“Parents…have no constitutional right… to prevent a public school from providing its students with whatever information it wishes to provide…when and as the school determines that it is appropriate to do so…. Although the parents are legitimately concerned with the subject of sexuality, there is no constitutional reason to distinguish that concern from any of the countless other moral, religious, or philosophical objections that parents might have to other decisions of the School District – whether those objections regard information concerning guns, violence, the military, gay marriage, racial equality, slavery, the dissection of animals, or the teaching of scientifically-validated theories of the origins of life.”

In 1997, father David Parker found out the hard way that he could not even opt his child out of teachings his family found offensive. His story and others are told in the new docudrama Overruled: Government Invasion of Your Parental Rights now showing (free!) at OverruledMovie.com.

Please take a few minutes to see for yourself how parental rights in America are being eroded right under our noses. Then find out what you can do to stop it.

Will schools continue to wall out all parents as they have in recent years? That remains to be seen. But one thing we already know – we as parents are powerless to stop them, unless we take a stand and demand that traditional parental rights be restored!

Michael Ramey is the Director of Communications & Research for ParentalRights.orgThis post was originally email correspondence sent by ParentalRights.org and was published with their permission.

4 comments
  1. I agree with this stand. No one is stopping parents from teaching kids outsider school. If you REALLY don’t like it, take them out a few days and educate them yourself. My arguement for this “status quo” is how disruptive are most parents. Do your “parental right” mean you hold your child’s hand at the dentist? Do you attend the OR for a toncillectomy? Do you ride the bus with them? Where would you draw the line?

    1. I think education is a fundamentally different issue.  The government legislates that children must be in school and that everyone must pay taxes to support those public schools.  For many parents in lower income brackets, the tax burden plus the relative higher costs associated with private schools and homeschooling precludes the latter two as options.  If the State is going to set up a system that essentially FORCES large numbers of parents to send their children to public schools, I think those same parents should be able to go into ANY classroom at a public school and witness first hand just exactly what it is they’re being made to pay for–especially when it so fundamentally affects their children.

    2. Force? Hardly. You can find a decent private elementary in every major city in America for less than $5k/year. And nearly all of those schools have need based aid. They will not only welcome parents in the classroom, but give them an additional tuition break for it! Sending your children to public school is an active choice; few people have no other options, and those who do have no other options almost universally live in rural areas.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

NYT Columnist Argues Against Impeaching Trump Says Pence is “Holy Terror”

Frank Bruni made an unusual argument against impeaching President Donald Trump: He believes Vice President Mike Pence would be worse.

The Christian Right and the Poor

Conservatives, in particular, conservative Christians get a bad rap from our “progressive”…

Harvard Poll: Millenials Ditch Obama and Obamacare

A poll of 18-to-29-year-olds conducted by the Institute of Politics at Harvard shows a significant drop in support of President Barack Obama and Obamacare.

President Barack Obama Goes After Gun Control

President Barack Obama signed 23 executive orders and called on Congress to pass gun control measures such as: universal background checks, a ban on “military style” assault weapons, and restriction on high-capacity magazines carrying more than 10 rounds.