Photo credit: Erik Drost via Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

To explain why I no longer affiliate with the Republican Party, I won’t focus on Donald Trump’s various issues and misdeeds. Rather, I want to talk about the Republican Party I joined in the 1990s.

The 1990s Republican Party was defined by its dedication to personal responsibility. It was a big theme at the 1992 Republican Convention which persuaded my parents to vote for the first time in decades.

The Republican Party took ethics seriously. It was young Republicans in Congress like John Boehner who exposed the misdeeds of the House Bank and the House Post Office. It exposed the perjury, obstruction of justice, and abuse of President Bill Clinton. Before that it challenged House Speaker Jim Wright’s ethics and forced him from office.

Republican concerns about ethics then weren’t limited to Democrats. Republicans who wanted to behave badly paid a price. While Democrats were prepared to give Bill Clinton an unlimited license to assault women, Five term U.S. Senator Bob Packwood (R-Oregon) was forced out of office for his sexual misconduct when Republicans held the Senate and made it clear that he would be expelled. Republicans pushed Packwood out even though they were at risk of losing (and did lose) Packwood’s Senate seat because Packwood’s conduct was unacceptable from someone holding a public trust. Ethics and values were more important than political victory.

Though Newt Gingrich was then the most powerful Republican in the country, the House reprimanded Gingrich for improprieties surrounding his book contract. Congressman Bob Livingston (R-Louisiana) was elected by the GOP caucus to replace Gingrich after the 1998 mid-terms. Livingston was set pick up the House Speaker’s gavel before he learned that information about three affairs he’d had in Congress were going to come to light. He resigned on the House floor because it was the right thing to do.

Republican politicians knew Republican voters wouldn’t tolerate misconduct and they’d lose all moral credibility to lead. Having good character was a core principle and practice that was expected from candidates across the board in local races to federal races.

In the 1990s,  Republican leaders understood that culture and civility mattered. The Constitution didn’t give them the right of censorship, but it did give them the right to shine the light on a corrupting and degrading culture.  Whether it was Dan Quayle warning of the danger of glamorizing single motherhood, or Bill Bennett highlighting Hollywood’s slouching towards the gutter, Republicans stood firmly for preservation of our culture.

The Republicans of old disdained identity politics of any sort and the efforts to pit one group of Americans against the other. This was something the left did which was repugnant to every right-thinking conservative Republican.

That was the Republican Party I joined. Today’s Republican Party no longer cares about honesty, integrity, and decency in public office and public life.

Many conservative Christian leaders remain within the GOP and suggest others need to do the same because of the Republican platform’s conservative positions on issues. The document has more to do with special interest influence that it does what candidates actually do when elected to office.

The practical change in the Republican Party can be seen in deeds. Personal responsibility was such a key value for 1990s Republicans, they took an entire night to speak in praise of the virtue at the 1992 GOP convention. Now the GOP has replaced this core idea with another philosophy that was expounded by a major 1990s pop culture figure: Pee Wee Herman.

The profound philosophy of Trump-era Republicanism echoes back to Pee Wee’s Big Adventure and Pee Wee’s declaration,  “I know you are but what am I.”

For example, consider Donald Trump appointing Steve Bannon, who made Breitbart a forum for the racist alt-right, to the White House position Karl Rove held in the Bush administration. If a liberal protests this appointment, some Republicans will respond that a Democratic Senator who died in 2012 was a KKK member sixty years before he died and that he was friend with Hillary Clinton. They may also point out that in 1865 most Democrats voted against the Thirteenth Amendment, so there. Apparently there is no misbehavior or corruption of Trump or his appointees if you can come with something similar that Democrats once did.

Defending Republicans’ corruption, dishonesty, and indecency by citing the same in Democrats guarantees, whichever sides wins, that America loses. When a republic embraces lies, decay, and corruption, it embraces its own death.

Throughout my life, I believed the Democratic Party has unintentionally been undermining our country’s foundations, culture, and long-term survival. I believed the GOP to be truly acting to preserve our civilization, however ineffectually at times. Yet, 2016 saw the creation of a new GOP that is outright as destructive to our nation’s founding principles and values as the Democratic Party, albeit in a different way.

I have no hope of the Republican Party again becoming a positive force in our country in the near future. I take Club for Growth founder Stephen Moore seriously when he told House Republicans they were no longer the party of Reagan but the party of Trump. I have no interest in being like  the conservative Democrats who continued to identify with a party decades after it’d ceased to represent their  values.

As of this writing,  I am politically homeless. While there are third parties in this country, I have little interest in joining the narrow ideologues that drive them. My disagreements with the Libertarian and the Green Parties cut too deep. I am closest to the Constitution Party, however it has yet to show itself as a serious party, particularly in my home state of Idaho. I hope someone will form a new conservative party for those who believe in liberty, decency, and the importance of integrity in government, while rejecting the white identity politics that Trump embraced during the campaign.

Regardless, I’ll support good candidates from any party that runs them. I simply refuse to identify with either of America’s two destructive political conglomerates. I entered 2016 as a longtime Republican. I leave it as only a Christian citizen more troubled than ever about the direction and future of this country.

7 comments
  1. Adam my friend, a reminder… there is no need to be more troubled than ever about the direction and future of this country, for God is in control. No worries.

  2. We tried “nice” with Romney in ’12 and they totally destroyed him with every dirty trick they could come up with, as they would have done with Cruz who many people supported also. So we were down to a “street fighter” who took them on and swatted them away like flies. We weren’t voting for a pastor but a leader, warts and all. We faced one of the most powerful political machines in our history – Clinton – and I truly nobody else could have beat her except Trump. I am more than willing to give him a chance and I feel he will get us out of a disasterous 8yrs of a closet muslim and a totally inept amateur. Pray for this country.

    1. Sheryl, your argument is responding to my article is, “This is why we chose to embrace lies, decays, and corruption.” Historically, your argument is specious. Most of the time when people like this Trump have held positions of leadership they’ve either ended up removed from office and/or fleeing the country with as much loot as possible, or setting themselves up as despot. But hey, who needs stupid history.. The GOP made its choice and he won, and now I’m making mine. I’ll pray for the country, but I am done with the GOP.

  3. Have a look into the newly forming Federalist Party. I’ve not made my mind up as to whether they are the real deal or charlatans, but they are saying all the right things for people like us.

    While I loath Trump and have left the GOP, I think conservatives may get a few good things out if his administration. The next two years will decide.

    1. I’ve taken a look into the Federalist Party after writing the article because some of their folks contacted me on Twitter. I think they are definitely sincere and have a lot of ideas for how a party should work and what should be the alternative, that will be very attractive. The big question is whether they will be able to get all the pieces in place, but I think I see more effort than typically goes into a political party.

      I also remain cautiously optimistic about many aspects of a Trump Administration. There are some areas of the regulatory state that it looks like will be scaled back. His economic team actually looks pretty solid. I hope we do get some good judges. And hopefully we’ll have an administration that will deal better with the U.N. and not be so hostile to Israel as Obama. I tend to think that eventually character will out with Trump. However, that happened with Clinton, but before it did we get welfare Reform and a balanced budget.So, I hope we get at least a few good things in the next four years.

  4. If you haven’t already signed up to become part of the new Federalist Party, I’d like to invite you to join us and get updates at thefederalistparty.org to learn more.
    Contact me if you’re interested in volunteer opportunities or learning more. We’re currently seeking state leaders and writers/contributors to the website.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Florida Church Remembering 9/11 By Burning Qurans, General David Petraeus Weighs In

Many churches if they do anything on 9/11 it is usually a…

Iowans Should Demand Transparency Concerning Union Negotiations

We must push to bring transparency to union negotiations for Iowa. State employees work for taxpayers who have a right to know what is going on.

Congress must fund CHIP Now

Congressman David Young (R-Iowa): Investing in CHIP helps ensure kids get the proper health care they need to be active and healthy, and helps put parents’ minds at ease. When kids start off their lives healthier they tend to stay healthy and pay less in health care costs throughout their lives.

Kavanaugh Confirmation Vote Will Be Difficult for Red State Democrats

President Trump’s nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court could prove to be problematic for Democrat U.S. Senators in red states who want to vote no on confirmation.