ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. Senators Kristin Gillibrand (D-NY) and Susan Collins (R-ME) introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act that would have prohibited “discrimination on the basis of gender identity.” This, if passed, would have undone President Donald Trump’s decision to halt President Barack Obama’s executive order allowing transgender persons to openly serve in the military.

With no fanfare from Republicans, Senate GOP leadership blocked a vote on the amendment.

Anna Anderson, the director of Religious Freedom at American Principles Project, this week described in Townhall.com the problems inherent with the amendment.

The problem with the Gillibrand-Collins proposal to prohibit “discrimination on the basis of gender identity” in the military is that they create a whole new set of problems by mischaracterizing concerns about the military’s affirmation of transgender identity. Just vague enough to sound harmless, this portion of the Gillibrand-Collins amendment purports to outlaw discrimination against current service members “solely on the basis of the member’s gender identity.” Much like the Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity laws—or SOGI laws—that keep popping up around the country, however, the Gillibrand-Collins amendment makes “gender identity” into a protected class within the military. This action would legally equate gender identity, which is subjective and unverifiable, with objective and unchangeable traits like race.

Caffeinated Thoughts has addressed this issue here and here.

Anderson responded to the news today in a released statement:

Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans showed wisdom and fortitude by opposing the radical Gillibrand-Collins Amendment to the NDAA and not even allowing it to come to a vote.

The substance of the Gillibrand-Collins Amendment would have been devastating to the military. By turning ‘gender identity’ into a protected class within military personnel, this amendment would have opened a Pandora’s box of military policy, endangering the rights of thousands of members, while putting politicized fads ahead of our national security.

Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans deserve credit for opposing this radical proposition right from the start, and for supporting the Trump administration’s ongoing deliberations on how to address those currently serving who are living with gender dysphoria.

The Democratic National Committee spokesperson Joel Kasnetz blasted the decision and said Republicans chose “bigotry over security.”

Last night, Republicans picked bigotry over security, and cowardice over taking a stand. By squashing even this incremental attempt to defend transgender members of the military against Trump’s offensive executive order, Mitch McConnell and Senate Republican leadership are destroying lives and disrespecting the people who keep them safe.

We know Trump’s order, if implemented, could result in capable service members being discharged because of their gender identity. That is unacceptable. Democrats believe all capable Americans should be able to serve our country openly and we demand respect for all members of our armed forces.

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
You May Also Like

Sarah Palin: Mr. President, is a strong America a problem?

By Sarah Palin Asked this week about his faltering efforts to advance…

See Roberts Run

Not since 1973 and Roe Vs. Wade has a Supreme Court decision…

Mitt Romney’s Albatross–RomneyCare: An Appeal to Federalism Won’t Help His 2012 Presidential Bid

David Weinberger at The Daily Caller wrote an op/ed about how RomneyCare…

In Defense of IFPC’s Vander Plaats Endorsement

In response to Shane’s post on 1/15/10 critiquing the endorsement. By Mike…