Michael Steele speaking with attendees at the 2017 National Council of La Raza
Former RNC Chair Michael Steele speaking with attendees at the 2017 National Council of La Raza.
Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore
Michael Steele speaking with attendees at the 2017 National Council of La Raza
Former RNC Chair Michael Steele speaking with attendees at the 2017 National Council of La Raza.
Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore

At the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), American Conservative Union (ACU) Communications Director Ian Walters made a statement about former RNC Chairman Michael Steele. Its key point was, ā€œWe elected Mike Steele to be the RNC chair because he’s a black guy, that was the wrong thing to do.ā€ That was the whole thrust of the statement. That the former Maryland Lieutenant Governor and State Party Chair was only elected to lead the RNC because of his race.

On Steeleā€™s Sirius radio program, he confronted ACU Chairman Matt Schlapp and pointed out the statement was akin to stating Steele only got into Georgetown or achieved anything else in life because of his race. Schlapp refused to disassociate himself from Walters. Instead, Schlapp responded that Steele had been a critic of President Trump and many policies that conservatives back. He further pointed to people critical of Steeleā€™s tumultuous two-year tenure as RNC chairman and suggested Steele just couldnā€™t handle the fact that not everyone is thrilled with him.

Thereā€™s room to criticize Steele on the issues as well as on his performance as Chairman, but that does not justify bringing up his skin color. The color of his skin had nothing to do with it. Walters was wrong to inject race into the equation. Late in the interview, Steeleā€™s co-host pointed out that Black people who might be open to the conservative message would back away because theyā€™d conclude white people hated them. Schlapp insisted, ā€œThatā€™s not where our heart is.ā€

Is Schlapp under the impression Black people have a superhuman ability to read peopleā€™s hearts?

Conservatives bristle at charges of racism because they donā€™t hate minorities. They wouldnā€™t refuse service to a black person. Theyā€™re not opposed to black people holding any job. They wonā€™t reject a candidate because of their race. Most white conservatives wonā€™t freak out if their children get engaged to a non-white person. White conservatives associate racism with historyā€™s violent racists like Hitler and the Ku Klux Klan. Crying ā€œracismā€ on people who donā€™t fit that profile is an excellent way to inflame and derail conversations.

However, most Republicans are indifferent to the concerns of Black Americans. The Trump years have made it too clear the GOP cares most about its political power. That is what motivates the GOP to throw rhetorical bones to groups who do meet the conservative definition of racism. That is why the GOP plays white identity politics. Others wonā€™t ā€œgo thereā€ personally, but they also wonā€™t stand up to those who do, for fear of losing the support of racists that the GOP thinks it needs to win.

Mr. Steele asked an essential question at the start of the interview. What made Walters think he could go ā€œthere?ā€ Schlapp danced around this for nine minutes. Neither Schlapp nor Walters will man-up and offer a real apology. Why? This country does have racists who believe the only way a Black person could achieve anything is if it were handed to him because of the color of their skin. Walters threw them a bone, expecting to get away with it due to the lack of moral courage in the CPAC hall and behind the scenes.

The Bible gives us a fair standard for judging peopleā€™s hearts. Christ says, ā€œThe good person out of the good treasure of his heart produces good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure produces evil, for out of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaks,ā€ (Luke 6:45, ESV, emphasis added).

How are Blacks to judge the hearts of Mr. Schlapp and Mr. Walters, based on their statements? The statements show a total lack of concern for Black Americans. Why would Blacks want to be a part of a movement or a party that panders to racists and excuses it by pointing fingers at Blacks?

If conservatives ever expect to recover from this, we need to condemn white identity politics and also turn from the gutlessness of those excusing it like Schlapp. Itā€™s not enough to ā€œnot be racist.ā€ Conservatives have to show sensitivity to the concerns of minority Americans.

Now, I donā€™t mean we must endorse the race theories that are themselves racist toward white people, blindly judging us by our skin color. What I advocate is following the Golden Rule, “So whatever you wish that others would do to you, do also to them.”

If thatā€™s too much to ask, then conservatism wonā€™t survive, nor does it deserve to.

You May Also Like

Priorities: Yours and Your Government’s

There is a steady Gallup poll that tells us what the most…

Ernst Joins Bipartisan Senate Coalition to End Earmarks

U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) joined U.S. Senators Jeff Flake (R-AZ), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Pat Toomey (R-PA), John McCain (R-AZ), Mike Lee (R-UT), Rob Portman (R-OH), Ron Johnson (R-WI), Marco Rubio (R-FL), and Deb Fischer (R-NE) to introduce the Earmark Elimination Act.

His Own Words

I won’t provide any commentary for this.  I’ll just let Senator Obama…

(Video) Sasse Warns Against Firing Attorney General Sessions

U.S. Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE): “It would be a very, very, very, bad idea to fire the Attorney General because he’s not executing his job as a political hack.”