In his autobiography, Ronald Reagan: An American Life, President Ronald Reagan wrote praise to President Calvin Coolidge when he wrote that he “always thought of Coolidge as one of our most underrated presidents.” Reagan further wrote:
He [Coolidge] wasn’t a man with flamboyant looks or style, but he got things done in a quiet way. He came into office after World War I facing a momentous war debt, but instead of raising taxes, he cut the tax rate and government revenues increased, permitting him to eliminate the wartime debt…
President Reagan found much he could admire with Calvin Coolidge. Perhaps the most common story told about Reagan and his admiration with Coolidge was when he symbolically placed the former President’s portrait in the Cabinet Room of the White House. As Reagan wrote:
One of the rooms in the White House that benefited from Nancy’s [Reagan] good taste was the Oval Office, which got some new paint, a new floor, and new carpeting. I did my part by hanging up a picture of Calvin Coolidge in the Cabinet Room.
Reagan’s placing Coolidge’s portrait in the Cabinet Room of the White House was more than just a symbolic gesture. It demonstrated Reagan’s political philosophy and the direction he would guide both the nation and his administration. In the presidential election of 1980 Reagan defeated President Jimmy Carter and during the campaign his major themes focused on restoring the American economy and national prestige on the world stage. Reagan promised to fight to reign in excess government, lower tax rates, and stop the march of communism abroad. In fact, Reagan stated that he was not a follower of the Nixon/Kissinger strategy of détente, but he was determined to see the United States victorious in the Cold War. These principles ushered in the Reagan Revolution. Reagan also faced a severe economic recession as he entered the White House. He also was confronted with a major labor crisis when air traffic controllers went on strike and Reagan looked to then Governor Calvin Coolidge’s handling of the Boston police strike and the principle that no one has a right to strike against the public safety.
Calvin Coolidge, whose path to the presidency was different than Reagan, did have some similarities. In the presidential election of 1920 Coolidge was selected by the Republican Party to run on the ticket with Ohio Senator Warren G. Harding. The Harding-Coolidge ticket won in a landslide under Harding’s slogan of “return to normalcy.” Just as with Reagan, both Harding and Coolidge faced a major economic crisis. The depression of 1920-1921 saw business decline, double-digit unemployment, and an economy faced with massive levels of wartime debt and taxation.
The politics of Harding’s “normalcy” was similar to Reagan’s remarks in his First Inaugural Address that government was not the solution to the problem, rather government is the problem. Harding’s economic program would focus on spending, tax, and debt reduction. These were very similar to Reagan’s economic policy objectives. Coolidge would assume the presidency in the aftermath of Harding’s death and he would continue the same policies. In the presidential election of 1924 Coolidge was elected in a landslide and his policies led to a period of economic expansion and growth. During his time in office Coolidge not only cut spending, but also cut tax rates, and paid down the national debt. President Reagan would also turn the deep recession that he inherited into a period of economic expansion that would last into the 1990s.
Both Reagan and Coolidge shared a similar political philosophy. For both the most fundamental aspect of their political philosophy rested on their admiration and devotion to the American Founding and the Constitution. Both Coolidge and Reagan believed that the Constitution was the true base of American government and liberty and they rejected the progressive/liberal view of a “living” Constitution which justified the expansion of government power through the administrative regulatory and welfare state.
The principle of limited government was not just a slogan for Coolidge and Reagan, but a deeply held virtue. Both Coolidge and Reagan not only believed in that limited government was best for the national economy, but it was also a moral foundation. They both shared the belief in cutting government spending, cutting tax rates, and paying down the national debt. They understood the importance of a balanced budget (especially Coolidge) and they both believed in sound money.
During their respective administrations they both had to fight against progressive political forces, which did not agree with their political principles. There were also some differences between Coolidge and Reagan, which reflected their respective eras. Coolidge was a supporter of restricting immigration and was a strong supporter of the tariff — as most Republicans supported tariffs to protect American industry and labor. President Reagan tended to be more libertarian regarding issues of immigration and trade, although he was not the “purest” advocate of free trade as he often is remembered. Reagan was also an advocate of a strong presidency and utilized his gift at communication as President Franklin D. Roosevelt had done during his time in office. Reagan became known as the “Great Communicator,” while Coolidge was known as “Silent Cal,” who preferred a more restrained presidency, but also communicated great things.
Reagan and Coolidge may share a similar conservative philosophy, but they are still separated by different eras of American history. As the late historian Robert Sobel wrote:
Even so, Reagan was no more a reincarnation of Coolidge than FDR was the second coming of Woodrow Wilson. The 1980s were so different from the 1920s, the problems the two men faced so disparate. In many ways, Coolidge was the last President of the 19th century. Reagan was the man who helped bring the 20th century to its end with the conclusion of the Cold War. Coolidge was also the last President who believed in a passive executive branch in times of peace and prosperity.
Perhaps the biggest divide, at least in terms of government, between Coolidge and Reagan was the New Deal and Great Society, which changed the social contract of American government. Coolidge did not live long enough to see the full consequences of the New Deal, but by the time of Reagan’s election the welfare state was a permanent fixture because of Roosevelt and Lyndon B. Johnson.
Reagan would be the first occupant of the White House to directly challenge the New Deal and Great Society legacy or at least attempt to roll back the size and scope of government. Past Republican administrations had made their peace or even contributed to the growth of the welfare and administrative state, but Reagan wanted to restore constitutional limited government. Although Coolidge fought battles to limit government spending successfully, Reagan failed in his objective to cut government spending, which he regretted.
Another philosophical difference was in economics. Although both believed in limited government along with lowering spending and tax rates, Reagan believed in the supply-side school of economics. Robert Sobel argued that “Coolidge was not a ‘supply-sider’ as Arthur Laffer and his disciples were to be in the 1980s.” Coolidge “meant for the tax cuts to be paid for mainly by reductions in government spending” noted Sobel. Although the tax cuts initiated by President Coolidge and his Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon are championed by supply-siders today as an example of sound tax policy, both Coolidge and Mellon also believed in the importance of a balanced budget. Also, Republicans of this era tended to support the protective tariff, which to most, if not all, supply-siders today is an unforgivable sin.
In the end Coolidge and Reagan shared a similar conservative philosophy rooted in the principles of the American Founding. Both held deep respect and admiration for the Founding Fathers and their administrations reflected an urgency to restore those principles back to the nation and in the process, they brought the national economy into periods of expansion and prosperity.