U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) on Thursday expressed her disapproval of President Donald Trump’s decision to pull troops out of Syria.

“I am deeply concerned with the administration’s decision to withdraw U.S. forces from Syria.  Our mission there is to defeat ISIS, and that is yet to be accomplished.  We committed to our partners on the ground to see this fight to the end, and we are now turning our back on their good faith efforts and sacrifices.  Our departure will only serve to encourage a reemergence of ISIS, embolden Russia, encourage Iran’s malign activity, and deter partners in the Middle East from cooperating with the United States.  I have been engaged with White House officials, and I will be seeking a meeting with President Trump to convey my strong opposition to the withdrawal,” Ernst said in a released statement.

Ernst joined U.S. Senators  Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina), Jeanne Shaheen (D-New Hampshire), Angus King (I-Maine), Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) and Marco Rubio (R-Florida) in sending a letter to President Donald Trump expressing their concern regarding the consideration to withdraw U.S. forces from Syria.

The text of the letter is below:

We write today to express our concern regarding your Administration’s consideration to withdraw U.S. forces from Syria.  We believe that such action at this time is a premature and costly mistake that not only threatens the safety and security of the United States, but also emboldens ISIS, Bashar al Assad, Iran, and Russia.

The United States currently retains a small and limited military presence within Syria.  The approximately 2,000 American troops stationed in Syria serve as a vital shield against ISIS cells operating within Northeast Syria. While you believe the threat of ISIS has dissipated, the conditions on the ground paint a very different picture.
In addition, our troops provide critical support for our Kurdish partners, who have been crucial in the fight against ISIS.  If our Kurdish partners in the region lose the support of the United States, we run the risk of a resurgence of ISIS and the possible capitulation or all out destruction of Kurdish resistance in the region. 

Furthermore, hundreds of foreign fighters being held in captivity by our Kurdish partners are at risk of being released or worse if our support is withdrawn.
If you decide to follow through with your decision to pull our troops out of Syria, any remnants of ISIS in Syria will surely renew and embolden their efforts in the region.  However, ISIS is not the only threat.  The brutal dictatorship of Bashar al Assad continues to weigh heavily upon the Syrian people, and we fear that a withdrawal of our troops may embolden Bashar al Assad to take further actions to solidify his power.
The withdrawal of American presence from Syria also bolsters two other adversaries to the United States, Iran and Russia.  As you are aware, both Iran and Russia have used the Syrian conflict as a stage to magnify their influence in the region.  Any sign of weakness perceived by Iran or Russia will only result in their increased presence in the region and a decrease in the trust of our partners and allies.  Your administration must not repeat the same mistakes that previous administrations have made and concede to these bad actors.

In conclusion, we encourage you to reconsider your proposal to withdraw U.S. forces from Syria to ensure that our nation’s strategic interests are secured.

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
  1. She lost my vote. Another warmongering neocon. I’m very proud of our president for doing this. God bless him.

    1. Who is for war? I mean seriously? I served in the military and I was thankful that I did not have to go to war, but I was ready to go if needed. You realize that there are positions in between neoconservatism and isolationism right? I believe we should have never been in Syria without Congressional approval. I believe military action should have clear objectives with an exit strategy. At the same time when you commit troops and make promises you should fulfill them. The President should also talk to his advisers and allies before going off half-cocked, and that is what this was half-cocked, and make an annoucement on Twitter that we are pulling out. Also, the statement that ISIS has been defeated is simply wrong.

      That said, had he made this announcement about Afghanistan, I would have supported it. I will support a Syria withdrawl when he actually goes out and makes his case and explains how he came to his decision. Breaking promises to allies is dangerous. You don’t have to be a interventionalist to recognize that.

Comments are closed.

You May Also Like

Trump Ends Shutdown and Gets What in Return?

President Donald Trump agrees to a 3-week spending bill that excludes border-wall funding in exchange for a congressional committee that will discuss it.

Reynolds Appoints Dan Huitink to State Judicial Nominating Commission

Gov. Kim Reynolds appointed Dan Huitink, deputy general counsel at the Vermeer Corporation, to fill a new seat on the state judicial nominating commission.

(Video): James Lankford Discusses Faith, Racial Reconciliation, and Civility

Shane Vander Hart and U.S. Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., discussed faith in politics, racial reconciliation, and civility at the Family Leadership Summit.

Sherman: My Interview with Bobby Schilling

Steve C. Sherman interviews former U.S. Rep. Bobby Schilling about his candidacy in Iowa’s 2nd Congressional District race.