Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States

WASHINGTON – Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas challenged the justices to confront the realities of what the Supreme Court “has wrought” through abortion rulings after it declined Friday to revive Alabama’s ban prohibiting dilation and evacuation (D&E) abortion.

Justice Thomas joined his colleagues in deciding not to hear West Alabama Women’s Center v. Thomas Miller, but he said the Court eventually must face the consequences from its past abortion decisions. The justice said that it is “implausible” that the Constitution would protect the dismemberment of a living child.

The U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the Alabama Unborn Child Protection from Dismemberment Abortion Act that prohibits “dismemberment” abortions of live unborn babies, although two of the three judges indicated they would have upheld the law but were bound by Supreme Court precedent.

In his concurring opinion Justice Thomas wrote, “The notion that anything in the Constitution prevents States from passing laws prohibiting the dismembering of a living child is implausible.” He also quoted the circuit court’s decision in describing the abortion procedure in detail: “It bleeds to death as it is torn limb from limb. It can, however, survive for a time while its limbs are being torn off. . .  At the end of the abortion — after the larger pieces of the unborn child have been torn off with forceps and the remaining pieces sucked out with a vacuum — the abortionist is left with a tray full of pieces.”

“This case serves as a stark reminder that our abortion jurisprudence has spiraled out of control. Earlier this Term, we were confronted with lower court decisions requiring States to allow abortions based solely on the race, sex, or disability of the child. …Today, we are confronted with decisions requiring States to allow abortion via live dismemberment. None of these decisions is supported by the text of the Constitution. Although this case does not present the opportunity to address our demonstrably erroneous “undue burden” standard, we cannot continue blinking the reality of what this Court has wrought,” wrote Thomas.

“Justice Clarence Thomas has addressed the justices on behalf of the more than 62 million unborn children crying out from the grave and the countless Americans who know that abortion is human genocide,” Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel, said. “There is nothing in the Constitution that prevents states from passing laws prohibiting abortion. Every American who values the sanctity of human life should be encouraged that Justice Thomas has invited the Supreme Court to address the reality that its’ precedents on this issue have wrought nothing but death.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Donald Trump and the ‘Electrification’ of the Church

President Donald Trump alludes that evangelical pastors credited with him church growth and said that the Church has never been so ‘electrified.’

Hillary Clinton: I Can Beat Him Again

Hillary Clinton discusses President Trump’s suggestion of a rematch: “So maybe there does need to be a rematch. Obviously, I can beat him again.”

U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services Issues Three Pro-Life Announcements

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued three pro-life announcements, including two rules dealing with the Obamacare contraceptives mandate.

Mice Have More Legal Protection Than Babies

A stem cell expert testified that hearts from live aborted babies procured from abortion providers are being used for research studies.