Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore

New York City is in crisis. The city of over 8.7 million people is the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. New York City currently has almost 41,000 cases, and nearly a third of the U.S. COVID-19 related deaths have been in the city.

Many governors and mayors have issued public health emergency proclamations that have ranged from shelter-in-place orders to the closure of individual businesses where people congregate and restrictions on gatherings or events of more than ten people.

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo issued a shelter-in-place order for the entire state. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio issued his own emergency executive orders in support of that, including empowering city agencies to enforce the emergency orders.

These orders have effectively prohibited corporate worship services within the city. The orders initially prohibited gatherings of more than 500 in attendance and eventually included every congregation.

I have written about my concern regarding the constitutionality of such orders on churches. I believe such orders are unconstitutional. That said, I do think congregations should voluntarily follow the recommendations regarding gatherings of ten or more during a pandemic out of love for our neighbors and one another, considering it is for a temporary period of time.

Recently, de Blasio issued a threat to churches and synagogues within his city. He said that congregations that do not follow the emergency orders and temporarily close could be closed permanently.

“Everyone has been instructed if they see worship services going on, they will go to the officials of that congregation. They will inform them they need to stop the services and disperse. If that does not happen, they will take additional action up to the point of fines and potentially closing the building permanently,” he said during a press briefing. 

(Why not mention mosques as well?) 

It is one thing amid a pandemic to stop the gatherings of ten or more people temporarily. Again, I question the constitutionality of such orders, but they are not without precedent. Threatening to confiscate a congregation’s building if they don’t comply is another thing entirely. It is tyranny. 

You May Also Like

Grassley Questions Barrett About Legislative History, Judicial Independence

U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley asked Judge Amy Coney Barrett about her view of using legislative history in interpreting laws and judicial independence.

Ernst, Grassley, and Reynolds Respond to Rollback of WOTUS

Iowa’s U.S. Senators Joni Ernst, Chuck Grassley, and Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds praised the redefining of Waters of the United States that rolls back Obama-era WOTUS regulations.

Why I Voted Against the 2018 Farm Bill

Chuck Grassley: Federal farm payments should not be manipulated to help corporate farming operations get bigger and bigger at taxpayer expense.

Employment Cases Go to Supreme Court

Title VII was enacted, in part, to protect women in the workforce from discrimination, and does not include claims based on ‘sexual orientation” and “gender identity.”