imageThe National Republican Senatorial Committee lawyer is back in D.C.,  yesterday the Anchorage Daily News reported on NRSC spokesperson Brian Walsh’s statement regarding mysterious calls being made to Alaskan Republicans who voted absentee:

"Bottom line, we’re not making phone calls to anyone, and we have told both campaigns that whomever is chosen by the voters of Alaska to be their nominee, that candidate will have our full support," said NRSC Communications Director Brian Walsh.

Walsh said he wasn’t aware of anyone else making such calls. He said the single NRSC lawyer sent to Alaska to assist Murkowski with the ballot count, Sean Cairncross, returned to Washington, D.C., on Saturday after 72 hours in the state. "This has been much ado about nothing," he said.

But apparently now that Cairncross is back in D.C., they are sending another.

Miller campaign spokesman DeSoto said NRSC is apparently now sending Mike Roman, who worked on the 2008 ballot recount for then-Sen. Coleman, to Alaska to work for Murkowski. Murkowski campaign manager Bitney said Roman is a private elections consultant who doesn’t work for the NRSC, and he is coming to Alaska at Bitney’s request. Roman is founder of Election Journal, which describes itself as an "online community dedicated to raising public awareness of vote fraud and election irregularities." The Election Journal site calls Roman a veteran political consultant and private investigator.

Why again is the NRSC getting involved?  ADN says that “the NRSC, while it helps Republican challengers in some races, is set up to protect the seats of Republican incumbents.”  Allahpundit says, not so fast…

DrewM argues that it’s no big deal for the NRSC to intervene on Murkowski’s behalf because, after all, she’s an incumbent and that’s what the NRSC is for. Is it, though? Here’s their mission statement:

The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) is the only political committee solely dedicated to electing Republicans to the U.S. Senate.

What We Do:
The NRSC provides invaluable support and assistance to current and prospective Republican U.S. Senate candidates in the areas of budget planning, election law compliance, fundraising, communications tools and messaging, research and strategy.

Nothing in there about incumbents. If, as seems clear, the goal of the Committee is to defeat Democrats, why they should have any preference in a primary — especially one where two Republicans are separated by one percent — is beyond me. Drew counters that, as a sitting senator, Murkowski’s partly responsible for raising money for the NRSC and therefore should be able to call on its resources, but again, that’s not what the Committee is supposed to be for. If incumbents want to start a National Incumbent Committee and raise money for themselves that way, fine; as it is, fundraising on the NRSC’s behalf is ostensibly done for all Republican candidates in the name of the betterment of the party.

In addition to the NRSC meddling, Dan Riehl reported that a Murkowski observer has been accused of possible vote tampering.  The reporter misidentified himself and was allowed unfettered access to a computer he should not have accessed.  This presented an opportunity for vote tampering.  Thomas Van Flein, who is representing the Miller Campaign (and is also Governor Sarah Palin’s personal attorney) wrote a letter of complaint to Alaska Lt. Governor Craig Campbell and Gail Fenumiai, Director of the Alaska Division of Elections.

Then to top it all off, it appears that the Alaskan Libertarian Party is actually seriously considering having Murkowski run with them if, for nothing else, the publicity it would bring.


  1. Pundits and the TEA PArty continue to confuse the great RINO hunt in the GOP with a national groundswell. The GOP has been engaged in bitter primaries all season. This bodes poorly for the GOP as it shows the great divvisions and animosities that exist in the party.

    With the exception of a few incumbents encumbered by poor personal performance or special conditions in their districts, the incumbents running will do fine in November.

    One has to question whether the big GOP contributions this quarter are funds from the normal cadre of party contributors or contributions from wealthy self-funding candidates buying party machinery that will function on their behalf.

    Such a trend will continue to dilute the GOP brand and strengthen the personality cults now dominating GOP politics.

    No political party has experienced the turmoil that the GOP has undergone this primary season and gone on to win the general.

    The GOP wii be no exception. Large turnout in closed primaries such as Alaska’s shows only that the GOP rank and file is in open rebellion against their party leaders.

    The GOP cannot hope to win elections if it continues to repudiate its senior elected officials as RINOs.

    1. We only call senior elected officials RINOs if in fact they are RINOs.

      I’m pretty careful throwing that term around, I know others may not be.

      When you are pro-choice and voted for TARF like Murkowski well let her record speak for itself.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

A Trump-Skeptical Conservative’s Guide to the 2018 U.S. Senate Elections

Adam Graham: There’s a good case to be made for Trump-skeptical conservatives supporting Republican Candidates for United States Senate .

CNN/Telemundo GOP Debate Recap

Shane Vander Hart provides a recap about the candidate performances in the CNN/Telemundo Republican debate held in Houston, TX before Super Tuesday.

Jim Bob Duggar at the Rick Santorum Caucus Night Victory Party

Jim Bob Duggar of the famous family featured in TLC’s 19 Kids…

Club for Growth Launches $1 Million Anti-Trump Ad Campaign in Iowa

Club for Growth launched $1 million advertising campaign targeting Donald Trump who is the current Republican presidential frontrunner.