Ron Paul’s speech at the Iowa Straw Poll on Saturday was substantially different than the other speeches I heard that day. Oh, he still spoke about some of the issues he is well known for such as his opposition to the wars we’re currently engaged in. But he spent much of his speech speaking to the issue of abortion, and I have to say I was impressed by it.

Sure, one could argue that doing so was a political necessity, but I don’t really care what his motivation was. I saw a man speaking from his heart and speaking from his experience. If you care about the issue of life, this was a good speech.

He began by pointing out that his campaign was “identified with the cause of liberty”, and went on to say that he was going to emphasize something a little different than the cause of liberty because there is something that precedes liberty: Life.

He said we need to “protect life and I mean all life”.

He said that in the 1950s when he was in medical school, abortion was a non-issue. Everyone was assumed to be pro-life. It was understood in the medical community that abortions weren’t to be performed. He said that changed in the 1960s when doctors began defying the law.

He went on to relate a story from when he was a medical resident in the 1960s and witnessed a hysterotomy in which a live baby was placed in a bucket and put in a corner of the room to die. He said everyone pretended not to notice. He walked out of that room and down the corridor, where there was a baby that was born prematurely. Paul said he saw twenty people on the medical staff there, doctors and nurses, in a mad scramble to save that baby’s life. He concluded that very day, he said, that you “cannot have relative value for life”, and that we “cannot play God and make those decisions. All life is precious”.

He added that rights don’t come from the government, they come from our creator.

He called the forcing of pro-life people to fund abortion via taxation an “atrocious” practice and said it “should be reversed”.

It’s my understanding that Paul thinks the best way to stop abortion is through passage of personhood legislation. If this was done, the unborn would already be under constitutional protection and an amendment banning abortion would be a moot point.

Say what you will about Ron Paul and his view of Federalism and the like. But however one might disagree with him on how best to address this issue, you cannot say he isn’t pro-life. As I wrote earlier, I saw a man speaking from his heart and speaking from his experience. If you care about the issue of life, this was a good speech.

 

Photo courtesy of Dave Davidson http://prezography.com/

6 comments
  1. Ron Paul respects all life, and not just unborn babies. Remember, “ALL men are created equal…”

    Sometimes Republicans forget that “All men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

    Notice how they didn’t say “JUST American men are created equal…”

    Man is not privileged to pick and chose which rights his fellow man will or will not have. Man is not God.

  2. Thank you for this positive article on Ron Paul, his message needs to get out there, the mainstream media is silencing him and he deserves to be heard just as much as all the other candidates. That is what the free press should be! It is time to stop allowing them to do our thinking for us!!

  3. I am not an abortion supporter. I do not wish for my tax dollars to pay for abortion. Those who do support abortion have the simplest of remedies for the supposed ‘poor women who cannot afford an abortion’ … donate their own money to an abortion clinic. Easy, right? Nancy Pelosi could easily use some of her own multi-millions to create a fund to do just that. As could any number of wealthy, Progressive, abortion supporters. No need to continue the nonsense that Americans support abortion. If they do, let THEM toss their own dollars into the pot. 

    For Planned Parenthood to bleat that they are forced to close their Women’s Health Clinics, owing to a lack of Federal or State funding, is a blatant lie. This non-profit makes money hand-over-fist. Let them put out a call for funding from their supporters, or start plowing some of their NON-profits back into those clinics. Either way, they DON’T need public funds. 

    I’m not going to vote for Rep. Paul. But on this issue I agree with him.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Jim DeMint and American Principles Project Team Up for South Carolina Presidential Forum

Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) is playing host (and King Maker?) along with…

Blum Releases Two Ads in Iowa’s 1st Congressional District Race

Congressman Rod Blum (R-Iowa) released two TV ads in the past week in his bid to be re-elected for a third term representing Iowa’s 1st Congressional District.

Mitt Romney Wins Illinois Primary

As expected.  Fox News and other news outlets were able to project…

Democrats’ October Surprise May Be Good for Mitt Romney

Democrats may be planning for an October surprise to spring on Mitt Romney which could include a story about him trying to talk a woman out of an abortion.