(Liberty Counsel) Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, who replaced Justice Antonin Scalia who passed away in February 2016, takes the bench just in time to vote on several high-profile cases.

Gorsuch will begin by hearing the April 19 oral arguments in Trinity Lutheran Church v. Pauley, a case of religious discrimination by the government.

Missouri’s Scrap Tire Program offers state funds to nonprofit groups that replace playground surfaces with recycled rubber. Trinity Lutheran Church applied to the program in 2012 to replace the gravel surface of its playground, but the state rejected its application, citing a clause in Missouri’s state constitution that bars the use of state funds “directly or indirectly, in aid of any church, sect, or denomination of religion.” At issue is a so-called “Blaine Amendment” that originated with U.S. Senator Blaine, who sought to amend the First Amendment to restrict private Catholic schools. When his efforts failed, some states adopted Blaine Amendments. Strictly applied, such provisions would prevent school vouchers and even restrict religious hospitals from receiving Medicare or Medicaid funds.

Another pending case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, first reached the Court in December, but the justices have not announced whether they’ll hear it. Jack Phillips, a baker, cited his religious beliefs when he refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. Multiple state courts sided with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which found that Phillips violated the state’s public accommodations laws by discriminating against same-sex couples.

In Peruta v. California, the justices will also review last year’s Ninth Circuit ruling that found there is no constitutional right to carry concealed firearms in public.

Gorsuch adheres to originalism – the idea that the best way to interpret the Constitution or laws is to determine the original words and intent.

“We are hopeful that Justice Gorsuch, as an originalist, will uphold the rule of law in these and future cases regarding religious freedom, marriage, abortion, the Second Amendment and more,” said Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel. “We must return to the rule of law where judges interpret the original meaning of the Constitution and the laws before them instead of imposing their personal opinions,” said Staver.

Liberty Counsel is an international nonprofit, litigation, education, and policy organization dedicated to advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of life, and the family since 1989, by providing pro bono assistance and representation on these and related topics.

You May Also Like

Tim Pawlenty at Des Moines Tea Party Rally: “The Government is Too Damn Big”

Former Governor Tim Pawlenty (R-MN) spoke to a crowd of approximately 300 …

Why Do We Need a Right-to-Try Bill in America?

Dr. Jane Orient: Nowhere does the U.S. Constitution give the federal government the authority to regulate the practice of medicine. And it is a very good thing that federal intervention and standards didn’t begin in 1789.

Report: Federal Employees Have 99.47% Chance of Never Being Fired for Cause

The Americans for Limited Government Foundation released a report that found rampant abuse and inefficiency within the Federal government bureaucracy.

Redistribution of Wealth

I listened to some excerpts of a radio interview that Senator Barack…