Photo Credit: Michael Judkins

AsĀ a Democratic majority-led House of Representatives taking office in January, leftists dreamĀ about what they can pass out of the House during this next session of Congress. Conservatives do the same so I don’t fault them for that. ThinkProgress, however, recently polled members of the House (both incumbents and incoming freshman) to see where they land on the Hyde Amendment.

The Hyde Amendment is language attached to appropriations bills that prohibits taxpayer funding of elective abortions.

According to ThinkProgress, a not insignificant number of members in the House want to see it gone:

By ThinkProgressā€™ count, at least 183 House members support repealing the Hyde Amendment, a legislative provision that prohibits federal Medicaid dollars from covering abortion except in cases of rape, incest, or life endangerment. Hyde is not permanent law butĀ writtenĀ and passed through congressional appropriations bills annually. Reproductive rights and justice advocates are cautiously optimistic 2019 is finally the year Congress doesnā€™t attach the coverage restriction or otherĀ similarĀ riders to an appropriation bill. The number of members backing repeal so far is a feat of its own.Ā 

Lawmakers will also have the opportunity to formally put an end to Hyde. Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) told ThinkProgress she will re-introduce the EACH Woman Act for the second time next year; the legislation ensures that anyone who gets health care through the federal government will have coverage for abortion services and that legislators cannot interfere with what private insurance covers. The bill needs support from at least 35 more representatives to pass, according to a ThinkProgress analysis.

As it relates to Obamacare, the Hyde Amendment was largely ignored. The Charlotte Lozier Institute and Family Research Council found that 650 Obamacare plans on state exchanges cover abortion on demand.Ā 

They noted that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services offered a rule that does not limit providers who want to insure elective abortion procedures, but yet protects taxpayers who do not want to pay for it.

Earlier this monthĀ HHS issued aĀ new ruleĀ directing insurers selling Obamacare plans that cover elective abortion to collect a separate payment from all enrollees for that coverage, as required by law. Under the Obama administration, insurers were allowed to collect these payments in a single transfer of funds in violation of clearĀ statutory language.

That will not satisfy Democrats who have gone from abortion being “safe, legal, and rare” to “unregulated, universally accepted, and paid for with taxpayer money.” This shift has occurred over time as the Democratic Party continues its leftward shift and is now support for taxpayer funding of abortion is in their party platform.

That is not in step with the American people however.Ā AĀ Marist pollĀ in 2017 found that a majority of Americans (61 percent) oppose taxpayer funding of abortion, including 40 percent of those who say they are ā€œpro-choiceā€ and 41 percent of Democrats.

The Hyde Amendment has saved lives.Ā More than twenty peer reviewed studies indicate that over two million lives have been saved since the Hyde Amendment was introduced in 1976, according toĀ a 2016 reportĀ by the Charlotte Lozier Institute.

If Democrats want to energize Republicans and conservative independents for 2020, repeal the Hyde Amendment. That will make the surge for Senate Republicans over Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation process look like nothing.Ā 

Photo Credit: Michael Judkins

You May Also Like

Bohlken: It’s Not Over

In a rebuttal to a recent op/ed of Shane Vander Hart’s, Donald Bohlken says Congress can object to and reject a state’s electoral college vote.

Watch: Shane Vander Hart Discusses COVID-19 Mitigation on Faith Works Live

Shane Vander Hart joined Mike Demastus and Ian Barrs on Faith Works Live on the Truth Network 99.3 FM to discuss COVID-19 mandates and mitigation measures.

Want To Pursue Your Dreams? Watch Out For Big Government

Kelvey Vander Hart: Want to pursue your dreams? Not if big government can keep you from doing so.

A Win for Religious Freedom and Free Speech in Federal Court

The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals said that wedding videos created by Carl and Angel Larsen are a “form of speech that is entitled to First Amendment protection.”