image
Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) pressed U.S. Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan on the limits of the federal government’s power under the commerce clause during her confirmation hearing today.  He referenced a fictitious law mandating that citizens eat three vegetables a day.  She said that it was a senseless law, but that Courts shouldn’t judge the constitutionality of a law on whether it makes sense.

This should have been a slam dunk question, of course the federal government shouldn’t be able to make a law telling us what to eat.  There is plenty of senseless government regulation passed under the guise of the commerce clause.

Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution states:

The Congress shall have Power… To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.

There is nothing in this clause, or in the Constitution as a whole, that gives the federal government any authority to mandate vegetable eating, involvement with education, or for that matter health care – especially telling people they have to have health insurance.

You can watch the exchange below:

You May Also Like

Michele Bachmann: The Patriot Act Satisfies the 4th Amendment

Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (R-MN) via Skype addressed those who attended the Polk…

Mosque at Ground Zero: Offering of Peace or Symbol of Conquest?

By Judy Shedlock First we overlooked the travesty of the Shanksville, Pennsylvania…

Grassley, Johnson Push for Legitimate Payment Limits in Upcoming Farm Bill Discussion

WASHINGTON – Senators Chuck Grassley and Tim Johnson today are introducing legislation…

Tilting Toward a GOP Takeover of the Senate?

With Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) being in trouble in the Wisconsin Senate…