Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) impressed me with his rationale behind his decision to vote no on Solicitor General Elena Kagan’s nomination to the United State Supreme Court.  He brought up her work against the partial birth abortion ban, citing international law, her inability to defend DOMA, etc.  He cited her inability to discuss where our rights come from.  He brought up 12-13 reasons why he was voting no, and in my opinion made a great argument against her nomination.  I encourage you to watch the remarks in full below:

Contrast Senator Grassley’s action with the that of his colleague, Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC).  He said he would vote for Kagan’s nomination because he believes that elections matter.

Yes they do, somebody needs to primary Senator Graham and show him just how right he is.  Just because President Obama won the election doesn’t mean that you have to rubber stamp all of his nominations.

You May Also Like

Iowa’s 3rd Congressional District Race: Brad Zaun Leads Leonard Boswell 51% to 41%

A poll was conducted for the American Action Forum of 400 likely…

Huckabee 2012? Simple Answer: It Might Depend on Whether Courage or Dread Wins Out.

In Governor Mike Huckabee’s new book, Simple Government, released tomorrow, he only…

Jeb Bush: Immigration Reform Because Immigrants Are More Fertile

Former Governor Jeb Bush (R-FL) told the audience at the Faith & Freedom Coalition conference that immigration is needed to prevent economic decline.

The Bill Of Rights, Guns, and Confusion

I’m no constitutional scholar, but something just doesn’t quite add up to…