Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) impressed me with his rationale behind his decision to vote no on Solicitor General Elena Kagan’s nomination to the United State Supreme Court.  He brought up her work against the partial birth abortion ban, citing international law, her inability to defend DOMA, etc.  He cited her inability to discuss where our rights come from.  He brought up 12-13 reasons why he was voting no, and in my opinion made a great argument against her nomination.  I encourage you to watch the remarks in full below:

Contrast Senator Grassley’s action with the that of his colleague, Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC).  He said he would vote for Kagan’s nomination because he believes that elections matter.

Yes they do, somebody needs to primary Senator Graham and show him just how right he is.  Just because President Obama won the election doesn’t mean that you have to rubber stamp all of his nominations.

You May Also Like

Social Security: What Must Be Done

Ever since Rick Perry entered the race, Social security has been a…

Huckabee 2012? Simple Answer: It Might Depend on Whether Courage or Dread Wins Out.

In Governor Mike Huckabee’s new book, Simple Government, released tomorrow, he only…

End-of-Life Provision Excluded

The Senate Finance Committee decided to exclude Section 1233 of HR 3200…

There Was No Trump Landslide

Adam Graham: President-elect Donald Trump would do well to ditch his national ball spiking tour and earn the trust of those who are skeptical about him.