Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) impressed me with his rationale behind his decision to vote no on Solicitor General Elena Kagan’s nomination to the United State Supreme Court.  He brought up her work against the partial birth abortion ban, citing international law, her inability to defend DOMA, etc.  He cited her inability to discuss where our rights come from.  He brought up 12-13 reasons why he was voting no, and in my opinion made a great argument against her nomination.  I encourage you to watch the remarks in full below:

Contrast Senator Grassley’s action with the that of his colleague, Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC).  He said he would vote for Kagan’s nomination because he believes that elections matter.

Yes they do, somebody needs to primary Senator Graham and show him just how right he is.  Just because President Obama won the election doesn’t mean that you have to rubber stamp all of his nominations.

You May Also Like

New Poll Shows Americans Reject Court-Imposed Abortion Policy

A new poll shows that of those who are decided 58 percent of Americans want their elected officials, not courts to determine abortion policy.

Newt Gingrich Strikes Out in First Week

I don’t know if the start to Newt Gingrich’s start of his…

Sebelius: Obamacare Navigators Are Not Required to Be Screened

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told a Senate Finance committee today that Obamacare Navigators with felonies could have access to personal information.

Shell Games, Shakedowns and Health Care Shenanigans

Throughout this whole health care reform business we’ve seen a lot of…