I hate these debates.

It isn’t that they aren’t important. They clearly are, as illustrated by the following:

Rick Perry went to the top of the polls merely by announcing his run. He subsequently hit the skids after abysmal debate performances.

I’m not sure anyone would even know who Herman Cain was, were it not for the debates. And after strong performances he led the pack by early October.

Meanwhile, Newt Gingrich routinely impressed audiences with his vast knowledge of the issues and of history, and his ability to articulate his points. The debate format is tailor made for him. After a truly pathetic start to his campaign (which I concluded was over before it began), he’s now at the top of the polls.

So it’s true. These events have an important role in the process.

I still hate them. When they’re over I frequently find myself unable to discern anything new that I’ve learned about the candidates or their positions. That causes me to ask another question: If these debates are really swinging support to or from candidates (and they certainly appear to be), on what basis are the American people giving or withdrawing their support? What is their criteria? And I’m very concerned that I probably know the answer.

In the now famous Nixon/Kennedy debates, Nixon was hurt by appearing pale, sweaty, and ill in the first nationally televised debate. Chris Matthews tells the story of the two campaigns having a fight in the basement of the building where the debate was held, with the Nixon campaign insisting that the air conditioning be increased to keep the temperature low and, in theory, keeping Nixon from sweating on camera during the next debate.

Consider this for a moment: The next President would be confronting a missile crisis in Cuba, dealing with slow economic growth domestically, and weighing conflict with Communism in Southeast Asia. Should we really have cared if the man we were considering for the Presidency sweats on camera?

This is not to say, of course, that the voters necessarily got it wrong at the end of the day. It’s how they may have gotten there that I find troubling.

You May Also Like

Mike Huckabee’s 2012 Door Not Slammed Shut

He’s likely in, he’s likely out, he’s maybe in… he’s likely out,…

Iowa’s in Play: Obama Trails Three Potential GOP Rivals in Latest Iowa Poll

“Iowa is not a secure state for Obama.”  Those are words I’m…

How One Miscalculation Shaped the 2016 Election

Adam Graham says if U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) focused on winning Iowa or New Hampshire the race for the Republican nomination would be different.

National Polling Between Trump and Clinton Tightens, Electoral Map Doesn’t

National polling indicates that the race between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton is tightening, but a look at the electoral map tells a different story.