Mike Huckabee speaking at Northwestern College in Orange City, IA. Photo credit: Dave Davidson (Prezography.com)
Mike Huckabee speaking at Northwestern College in Orange City, IA<br>Photo credit: Dave Davidson – Prezography.com

Mike Huckabee speaking at Northwestern College in Orange City, IA<br>Photo credit: Dave Davidson - Prezography.com
Mike Huckabee speaking at Northwestern College in Orange City, IA
Photo credit: Dave Davidson – Prezography.com

Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee is taking some heat for suggesting that the Supreme Court has no authority to make laws, but only to interpret them, though this is taught in about every school in the country. It is called “the balance of powers”. The legislative branch makes laws, the executive branch enforces the law, and the judicial branch interprets the laws. All must follow the Constitution.

Among those opposing Huckabee’s view are David Graham at The Atlantic, who suggested that the result might be another civil war, and Jazz Shaw at Hot Air who says, “Huckabee is taking this in a rather startling and difficult to defend direction,

The idea that the Supreme Court is the supreme law of the land, however, is repugnant to the idea that the three branches are co-equal. If that idea were so, there would be no need for the other two branches.  However, Democrats (and sometimes Republicans) expect the Supreme Court to make the laws. George W Bush did this when he signed the most recent Campaign Finance Law overhaul. He defended the “bad” parts of the law, saying he was confident the Supreme would fix it.  They did not, at least until 2010, when the Citizens United case came down supporting the notion that contributions to candidates and PACs amount to the exercise of free speech.

Huckabee asks this rhetorical question in his interview with Mike Wallace of Fox News:

“Then, what if the Supreme Court ruled they were going to make the decision as to who was going to be the next president and save the taxpayers and voter from all the expense and trouble of voting?

The current meme is what the Supreme Court did in the 2000 election race (Bush v. Gore). But an “official recount” by the National Opinion Research Center, of the disputed counties in Florida that Vice-President Gore had asked for, would have still made Bush the winner. In other words, had the Supreme Court allowed Florida to finish its umpteenth recount, Bush would have won anyway.

“Attorney for the Landmark Foundation, Mark Levin (who thought Bush v. Gore was decidedly wrong and wrongly decided) makes a convincing case that Bush would have won under every conceivable scenario even if the Supreme Court had sided with Vice-President Al Gore in Bush v Gore. See Men in Black: How the Supreme Court is Destroying America (2005) Regnery: Washington DC, pp. 170-173″1

1. A quote from With Christ in the Voting Booth (2013, David Shedlock – Calvary Press, p. 37, footnote)  For full disclosure, my book was endorsed by Mike Huckabee.

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
1 comment
  1. The Constitution spells out that the State Legislatures determine how the election is to be done in their State. Article II section 1 “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress:” In Florida the legislature had set up the election process and the recount process. The Democrats petitioned the State Supreme Court to over ride the Constitution and the Law to recount the votes in the way they demanded. The U.S. Supreme Court said no you must follow the Constitution. By the Constitution and Florida Law Bush was the winner. The Democrats moves to not count Military votes and selectively recount votes where they thought they might pick up votes was wrong, dishonest, and illegal.

Comments are closed.

You May Also Like

Fiorina: Trump Should Go After ‘His Good Friend’ Hillary Clinton (Video)

Carly Fiorina responding to Trump’s recent actions: “It would be nice if occasionally Donald Trump would throw a punch at his good friend Hillary Clinton.”

Trump Must Think Republicans are a Mob

Donald Trump said in his first post-nomination interview Ted Cruz was lucky he walked in during his speech or else he may have been pulled from the stage.

Evan McMullin Offers the Leadership America Needs

Adam Graham: At the end of the day, I decided independent candidate Evan McMullin is the best candidate to lead our nation for the next four years.